03 — ONGOING
Long Term Partnership
A fractional Head of Payments Strategy, embedded in your business for as long as the decisions keep coming, not a consultant you re-explain things to every time something comes up.

Some organisations need payments, commerce or regulatory strategy expertise regularly enough to matter, but not consistently enough to justify a full-time hire, or simply don't want that specialism sitting on permanent payroll when the market and the mandates keep shifting underneath it. That's increasingly known in the market as a fractional executive relationship, and it's exactly the gap this tier fills.
This runs as a retainer, not a project, which means I stay close enough to the business to speak with real context every time, rather than starting from zero on each call. Board papers, vendor negotiations, scheme mandate changes, the quiet architecture decisions that don't feel urgent until they suddenly are, I'm already inside the problem when they land, not being briefed on it from scratch.
What makes this different from a generalist fractional executive is the specific vantage point behind it. I've sat on every side of the four-party payments model, issuer, acquirer, processor and scheme, across a genuine multichannel retailer and one of the world's largest payment networks. Most fractional leadership hires bring broad commercial experience to a payments problem. This brings payments experience to the commercial problem, which is usually the more useful thing when the decisions in question are actually about acceptance, settlement or scheme risk.
What it typically looks like
Fractional Head of Payments Strategy or Chief Payments Officer for a scale-up merchant or marketplace navigating a platform decision or replatform
Embedded strategic support through a carve-out or integration, where separation costs hide in places a generalist wouldn't think to look
A standing, credible payments voice for a fintech or PSP selling into enterprise merchants, where the credibility gap is often the actual blocker
How it runs Structured as an ongoing retainer, scoped to a realistic level of monthly engagement rather than an open-ended commitment on either side, reviewed periodically so it keeps earning its place, not just renewing by default.
If that kind of continuity is what you actually need, let's talk about what it would look like.
Engagement models designed for clarity and forward motion.

01 — TIME-CRITICAL
Rapid Response Engagement
Focused counsel when a consequential decision cannot wait.

02 — STRUCTURED
Project Based Engagement
A defined mandate, clear workstreams and measurable momentum.